Sikap dan Pandangan GMKI atas Tragedi Bom di GBIS Solo Terhadap Pemerintah
In writing by the Executive on facebook Gmki on Tuesday, September 27, 2011 at 1:17 pm, In a press conference conducted at the PGI auditorium, Salemba (Monday, September 26, 2011). GMKI by the Central Executive Chairman (Jhony Grace) and DPP Chairman GAMKI (Michael Wattimena), convey the organizational attitude to the media related human tragedy committed by terrorist groups in Solo, Central Java on 25 September 2011. The views and attitudes presented by the Chairman of GMKI are as follows:
1. The issue's development Bomb Bethel Full Gospel Church (GBIS) at Solo yesterday should be viewed in the perspective of humanitarian issues (not in other forms), because they are threatened and died there are a citizen of the Republic of Indonesia.
2. Associated with it then what is conveyed by the President on some time ago that Indonesia "is not the Failed State", was inversely proportional to prove facts. The events that occurred in several places (say the case of Ambon, Terrorism in the Solo case yesterday and several other corruption cases are not dealt with thoroughly in this country), prove that Indonesia is a Failed State. Failed in providing security protection, Failure in the eradication of corruption, failed in managing Pluralism, and many other failures that can be found all around us.
3. Chief of Police and head of BIN, the two people most responsible for these problems. In that perspective it is a substantial question is why the President did not have the courage to remove these two high-ranking State (National threat / security of this country khan repeatedly occurred), or should we suspect strongly that there are certain interests that the president still retain them in This is a very strategic position, although with a very bad performance.
4. We must also strongly suspect that the issue of terrorism was used as a "project" by the authorities to get the "advantage" in the two approaches, namely;
1. Get very large stimulus funds from other countries that pro-actively with the eradication of Terrorism in Indonesia (say Detachment 88 which financed Australia, because there are 88 people Australians who died during the Bali bombings of 2000), and others and,
2. To the power elite who are considered "meritorious" in the handling of terrorism will be rewarded with praise and promotion.
3. It is unfortunate if the two things that can happen.
5. If this is allowed to occur continuously (maintained / condoned by the State), then the future will emerge from the collective consciousness of citizens of Indonesia to no longer trust the government institutions (under the leadership of Mr.. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono), the accumulation may occur in the form- REVOLUTION form of government. source
1. The issue's development Bomb Bethel Full Gospel Church (GBIS) at Solo yesterday should be viewed in the perspective of humanitarian issues (not in other forms), because they are threatened and died there are a citizen of the Republic of Indonesia.
2. Associated with it then what is conveyed by the President on some time ago that Indonesia "is not the Failed State", was inversely proportional to prove facts. The events that occurred in several places (say the case of Ambon, Terrorism in the Solo case yesterday and several other corruption cases are not dealt with thoroughly in this country), prove that Indonesia is a Failed State. Failed in providing security protection, Failure in the eradication of corruption, failed in managing Pluralism, and many other failures that can be found all around us.
3. Chief of Police and head of BIN, the two people most responsible for these problems. In that perspective it is a substantial question is why the President did not have the courage to remove these two high-ranking State (National threat / security of this country khan repeatedly occurred), or should we suspect strongly that there are certain interests that the president still retain them in This is a very strategic position, although with a very bad performance.
4. We must also strongly suspect that the issue of terrorism was used as a "project" by the authorities to get the "advantage" in the two approaches, namely;
1. Get very large stimulus funds from other countries that pro-actively with the eradication of Terrorism in Indonesia (say Detachment 88 which financed Australia, because there are 88 people Australians who died during the Bali bombings of 2000), and others and,
2. To the power elite who are considered "meritorious" in the handling of terrorism will be rewarded with praise and promotion.
3. It is unfortunate if the two things that can happen.
5. If this is allowed to occur continuously (maintained / condoned by the State), then the future will emerge from the collective consciousness of citizens of Indonesia to no longer trust the government institutions (under the leadership of Mr.. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono), the accumulation may occur in the form- REVOLUTION form of government. source





0 comments:
Post a Comment